<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 622 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751441</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned assessment order for AY 2013-14, remanding the case to the respondent for a fresh review. The court emphasized adherence to Circular No.05 of 2021 and principles of natural justice, requiring the respondent to furnish invoices, allow cross-examination of dealers, and investigate misuse of the petitioner&#039;s name. The Writ Petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:28:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 622 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751441</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned assessment order for AY 2013-14, remanding the case to the respondent for a fresh review. The court emphasized adherence to Circular No.05 of 2021 and principles of natural justice, requiring the respondent to furnish invoices, allow cross-examination of dealers, and investigate misuse of the petitioner&#039;s name. The Writ Petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>