<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1264 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313479</link>
    <description>The SC declined to interfere in exercise of its discretionary appellate jurisdiction after hearing the matter on merits and considering the nature of the transactions. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed on merits, and the Court expressly left open any question of law arising from the dispute for consideration in an appropriate future case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 20:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1264 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313479</link>
      <description>The SC declined to interfere in exercise of its discretionary appellate jurisdiction after hearing the matter on merits and considering the nature of the transactions. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed on merits, and the Court expressly left open any question of law arising from the dispute for consideration in an appropriate future case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>