<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1450 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313467</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of tax at source on communication and connectivity charges turned on whether payments to a foreign group entity were mere cost reimbursements or consideration attracting withholding obligations. The appellate order was found insufficiently reasoned because it did not properly address the recorded submissions or explain why the payment was not liable to disallowance. The deletion of the disallowance was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication on the nature of the payment and the applicability of the provision. The cross-objection seeking an enhanced deduction under section 10A did not survive independently and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 20:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1450 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313467</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of tax at source on communication and connectivity charges turned on whether payments to a foreign group entity were mere cost reimbursements or consideration attracting withholding obligations. The appellate order was found insufficiently reasoned because it did not properly address the recorded submissions or explain why the payment was not liable to disallowance. The deletion of the disallowance was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication on the nature of the payment and the applicability of the provision. The cross-objection seeking an enhanced deduction under section 10A did not survive independently and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>