https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313458 The SC allowed the appeals of the accused, setting aside their convictions and sentences due to non-compliance with Section 20-A(1) of TADA, which mandates prior approval by the District Superintendent of Police. The State's appeals against acquittals and for sentence inadequacy were dismissed. The court highlighted the necessity of strict adherence to statutory safeguards to prevent TADA misuse, affirming that procedural compliance is crucial to uphold the rule of law. Convictions under other laws, based on TADA confessions, were also invalidated. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:52:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313458 The SC allowed the appeals of the accused, setting aside their convictions and sentences due to non-compliance with Section 20-A(1) of TADA, which mandates prior approval by the District Superintendent of Police. The State's appeals against acquittals and for sentence inadequacy were dismissed. The court highlighted the necessity of strict adherence to statutory safeguards to prevent TADA misuse, affirming that procedural compliance is crucial to uphold the rule of law. Convictions under other laws, based on TADA confessions, were also invalidated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313458