<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 877 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313457</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the civil appeal, setting aside the impugned orders. It declared that the preliminary notification dated 01.05.1980 had lapsed, and the declaration made on 19.03.1987 was legally unsustainable. If possession of the land had been taken from the appellants, it was to be restored without delay. No orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:29:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 877 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313457</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the civil appeal, setting aside the impugned orders. It declared that the preliminary notification dated 01.05.1980 had lapsed, and the declaration made on 19.03.1987 was legally unsustainable. If possession of the land had been taken from the appellants, it was to be restored without delay. No orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>