https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313457 A mandatory outer limit under the validating statute governed declarations following a pre-commencement land acquisition notice; once the declaration under Section 6 was made beyond two years from commencement, the earlier Section 4 notification lapsed and the acquisition could not survive. The Court also held that urgency powers dispensing with the Section 5-A inquiry could be used only on proof of real and immediate necessity supported by material, and not after an unexplained delay of about seven years. As no such urgency was shown, the invocation of Section 17 and exclusion of objections was legally unsustainable. The acquisition proceedings therefore failed. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:29:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313457 A mandatory outer limit under the validating statute governed declarations following a pre-commencement land acquisition notice; once the declaration under Section 6 was made beyond two years from commencement, the earlier Section 4 notification lapsed and the acquisition could not survive. The Court also held that urgency powers dispensing with the Section 5-A inquiry could be used only on proof of real and immediate necessity supported by material, and not after an unexplained delay of about seven years. As no such urgency was shown, the invocation of Section 17 and exclusion of objections was legally unsustainable. The acquisition proceedings therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313457