<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 611 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751430</link>
    <description>SC ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to reimburse GST amounts paid from 24.05.2019 onwards. The court interpreted contractual clauses, finding the respondent liable to refund GST based on tender notification and work order terms. The judgment mandated full reimbursement with reference to previous similar case precedents, emphasizing the respondent&#039;s obligation to compensate the petitioner for GST expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 611 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751430</link>
      <description>SC ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to reimburse GST amounts paid from 24.05.2019 onwards. The court interpreted contractual clauses, finding the respondent liable to refund GST based on tender notification and work order terms. The judgment mandated full reimbursement with reference to previous similar case precedents, emphasizing the respondent&#039;s obligation to compensate the petitioner for GST expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>