<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751412</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld reopening of assessment u/s 147 based on investigation wing information regarding accommodation entries from Sarwaria Investments Consultants Pvt. Ltd., finding tangible material justified reassessment despite prior assessment u/s 143(3). However, ITAT allowed appeal regarding addition u/s 68, ruling assessee discharged initial onus proving lender&#039;s identity through PAN, creditworthiness via bank statements, and transaction genuineness through account confirmations and Form 26AS. AO failed to conduct further inquiry through summons u/s 131, inspection, or inquiry letters u/s 133(6) after assessee provided evidence. ITAT directed deletion of addition u/s 68, holding AO cannot shift onus back to assessee without proper investigation of submitted documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:24:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751412</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld reopening of assessment u/s 147 based on investigation wing information regarding accommodation entries from Sarwaria Investments Consultants Pvt. Ltd., finding tangible material justified reassessment despite prior assessment u/s 143(3). However, ITAT allowed appeal regarding addition u/s 68, ruling assessee discharged initial onus proving lender&#039;s identity through PAN, creditworthiness via bank statements, and transaction genuineness through account confirmations and Form 26AS. AO failed to conduct further inquiry through summons u/s 131, inspection, or inquiry letters u/s 133(6) after assessee provided evidence. ITAT directed deletion of addition u/s 68, holding AO cannot shift onus back to assessee without proper investigation of submitted documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>