<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36467</link>
    <description>HC held that mercantile accounting only fixes timing of tax liability and cannot by itself establish that interest income has in fact materialised. The Tribunal rightly found that crediting accrued interest on illusory outstandings was unrealistic, so the interest did not accrue at year-end despite mercantile accounts. The question was answered in the assessee&#039;s favour and the assessee was awarded costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 20:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36467</link>
      <description>HC held that mercantile accounting only fixes timing of tax liability and cannot by itself establish that interest income has in fact materialised. The Tribunal rightly found that crediting accrued interest on illusory outstandings was unrealistic, so the interest did not accrue at year-end despite mercantile accounts. The question was answered in the assessee&#039;s favour and the assessee was awarded costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>