<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 572 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751391</link>
    <description>Delay in filing an appeal under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was held to fall within the permissible period on the facts stated in the condonation application, and the Tribunal ought to have condoned it. The Supreme Court directed condonation of delay and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for hearing of the appeal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 07:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 572 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751391</link>
      <description>Delay in filing an appeal under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was held to fall within the permissible period on the facts stated in the condonation application, and the Tribunal ought to have condoned it. The Supreme Court directed condonation of delay and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for hearing of the appeal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>