<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 565 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751384</link>
    <description>HC declared that NCLT lacks jurisdiction to entertain CIRP petitions against partnership firms under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that the Code does not permit such proceedings against partnership firms or their directors before NCLT. The e-filing by respondent under Section 95 was declared non est and illegal. Consequently, all proceedings before NCLT were quashed for want of jurisdiction. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 565 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751384</link>
      <description>HC declared that NCLT lacks jurisdiction to entertain CIRP petitions against partnership firms under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that the Code does not permit such proceedings against partnership firms or their directors before NCLT. The e-filing by respondent under Section 95 was declared non est and illegal. Consequently, all proceedings before NCLT were quashed for want of jurisdiction. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>