<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1379 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313451</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the Calcutta HC&#039;s order and remanded the case to the Division Bench for re-hearing on its merits. The SC emphasized that the HC must exercise discretion in line with statutory provisions and the rule of law, ensuring authorities act lawfully. Writ jurisdiction should not direct actions contrary to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1379 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313451</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the Calcutta HC&#039;s order and remanded the case to the Division Bench for re-hearing on its merits. The SC emphasized that the HC must exercise discretion in line with statutory provisions and the rule of law, ensuring authorities act lawfully. Writ jurisdiction should not direct actions contrary to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>