<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 939 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313440</link>
    <description>A challenge to outsourcing of services failed because the impugned measure was treated as a bona fide policy decision aimed at economy and efficiency and consistent with applicable financial rules. The petitioners did not produce appointment orders, and there was no specific order of removal or contemplated termination shown against them. In the absence of clear proof of their service status and any enforceable legal right, they could not restrain outsourcing of the services concerned. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the original application was therefore upheld, and the interim protection previously granted ceased to operate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:02:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 939 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313440</link>
      <description>A challenge to outsourcing of services failed because the impugned measure was treated as a bona fide policy decision aimed at economy and efficiency and consistent with applicable financial rules. The petitioners did not produce appointment orders, and there was no specific order of removal or contemplated termination shown against them. In the absence of clear proof of their service status and any enforceable legal right, they could not restrain outsourcing of the services concerned. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the original application was therefore upheld, and the interim protection previously granted ceased to operate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>