<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Authorities Can&#039;t Attach Third-Party Property for Recovery; Disputes Must Go to Civil Court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76605</link>
    <description>Authority under the Customs Act to proceed against the property of a third party - Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions - The High Court emphasizes that respondent No. 2 cannot question the petitioner’s ownership of the flat, even if it was purchased by her husband. Referring to Section 3 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, the court states that only the husband could question the petitioner’s ownership, and any such dispute should be resolved in a civil court. - The High Court finds that respondent No. 2 lacked jurisdiction to issue the communication under the Customs Act. There is no provision allowing customs officials to attach the property of a third party, such as the petitioner, who is not connected to any recovery under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:32:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Authorities Can&#039;t Attach Third-Party Property for Recovery; Disputes Must Go to Civil Court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76605</link>
      <description>Authority under the Customs Act to proceed against the property of a third party - Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions - The High Court emphasizes that respondent No. 2 cannot question the petitioner’s ownership of the flat, even if it was purchased by her husband. Referring to Section 3 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, the court states that only the husband could question the petitioner’s ownership, and any such dispute should be resolved in a civil court. - The High Court finds that respondent No. 2 lacked jurisdiction to issue the communication under the Customs Act. There is no provision allowing customs officials to attach the property of a third party, such as the petitioner, who is not connected to any recovery under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:32:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>