https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751354 Arrest under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was upheld where the authorised officer had material in possession, recorded reasons to believe in writing, and communicated the grounds of arrest. The Court found witness statements, approver statements, digital and corroborative material sufficient at the arrest stage, and treated the petitioner's challenge to their credibility as unsuitable for a writ-based mini-trial. The remand order also stood because the court verified compliance and applied judicial mind to the material produced. On that basis, the custody challenge failed and release from custody was refused. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 14 Apr 2024 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751354 Arrest under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was upheld where the authorised officer had material in possession, recorded reasons to believe in writing, and communicated the grounds of arrest. The Court found witness statements, approver statements, digital and corroborative material sufficient at the arrest stage, and treated the petitioner's challenge to their credibility as unsuitable for a writ-based mini-trial. The remand order also stood because the court verified compliance and applied judicial mind to the material produced. On that basis, the custody challenge failed and release from custody was refused. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751354