<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 532 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal due to the lack of specification of the service category in the show cause notice. The absence of this crucial detail deprived the appellant of a proper defense, rendering the proceedings vitiated. Consequently, the demand for service tax and associated penalties under Section 76 and 77(2) of the Finance Act 1994 were annulled, granting the appellant consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 532 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal due to the lack of specification of the service category in the show cause notice. The absence of this crucial detail deprived the appellant of a proper defense, rendering the proceedings vitiated. Consequently, the demand for service tax and associated penalties under Section 76 and 77(2) of the Finance Act 1994 were annulled, granting the appellant consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>