<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1832 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313434</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision. The primary legal issue was the rejection of books of account before referring to the D.V.O. under Section 142A. The Court relied on the precedent set by the SC in Sargam Cinema, which was deemed applicable, thus ruling against the Revenue&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1832 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313434</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision. The primary legal issue was the rejection of books of account before referring to the D.V.O. under Section 142A. The Court relied on the precedent set by the SC in Sargam Cinema, which was deemed applicable, thus ruling against the Revenue&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>