<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 527 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751346</link>
    <description>The SC found procedural defects in the tax order under CGST Act. The impugned order was set aside due to lack of proper consideration of the petitioner&#039;s detailed reply, absence of opportunity for clarification, and insufficient examination of submitted documents. The matter was remitted to the Proper Officer for fresh adjudication with a directive to provide personal hearing within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 527 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751346</link>
      <description>The SC found procedural defects in the tax order under CGST Act. The impugned order was set aside due to lack of proper consideration of the petitioner&#039;s detailed reply, absence of opportunity for clarification, and insufficient examination of submitted documents. The matter was remitted to the Proper Officer for fresh adjudication with a directive to provide personal hearing within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>