<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 519 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751338</link>
    <description>Writ maintainability despite a statutory GST appeal is examined where the dispute requires substantive consideration of whether remuneration paid to international assignees under independent employment contracts constitutes employee services to an employer or taxable services. The issue also concerns treatment of such remuneration as employment income subject to tax withholding and the relevance of the Supreme Court ruling in Northern Operating Systems. The statutory appellate-remedy objection is not sustained at the preliminary stage for examining these questions. Pending final disposal, the protested deposit remains subject to the petition&#039;s outcome and the residual assessment demand remains in abeyance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 519 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751338</link>
      <description>Writ maintainability despite a statutory GST appeal is examined where the dispute requires substantive consideration of whether remuneration paid to international assignees under independent employment contracts constitutes employee services to an employer or taxable services. The issue also concerns treatment of such remuneration as employment income subject to tax withholding and the relevance of the Supreme Court ruling in Northern Operating Systems. The statutory appellate-remedy objection is not sustained at the preliminary stage for examining these questions. Pending final disposal, the protested deposit remains subject to the petition&#039;s outcome and the residual assessment demand remains in abeyance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>