<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 513 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751332</link>
    <description>HC quashed tax demand order due to procedural irregularities in notice service. Court found potential breach of natural justice as petitioner could not access GST portal notices. Order remanded for reconsideration, requiring petitioner to pay 10% disputed tax and submit reply within two weeks. Respondent directed to provide fair hearing and issue fresh order within two months, preserving petitioner&#039;s legal contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 513 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751332</link>
      <description>HC quashed tax demand order due to procedural irregularities in notice service. Court found potential breach of natural justice as petitioner could not access GST portal notices. Order remanded for reconsideration, requiring petitioner to pay 10% disputed tax and submit reply within two weeks. Respondent directed to provide fair hearing and issue fresh order within two months, preserving petitioner&#039;s legal contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>