<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Removes Tax Penalty Against Minor, Citing Lack of Guardian Consent and No Additions in Quantum Proceedings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76579</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s argument regarding being a minor, stating that penalty proceedings initiated against a minor without the consent of their guardian are not legally sustainable. Considering this and the lack of additions in the quantum proceedings, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the remaining penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:18:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:18:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Removes Tax Penalty Against Minor, Citing Lack of Guardian Consent and No Additions in Quantum Proceedings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76579</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s argument regarding being a minor, stating that penalty proceedings initiated against a minor without the consent of their guardian are not legally sustainable. Considering this and the lack of additions in the quantum proceedings, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the remaining penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:18:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>