<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 478 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751297</link>
    <description>An allottee in a real estate project remains a financial creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code because the amount raised from such allottee is deemed to have the commercial effect of a borrowing. A RERA refund order does not extinguish the underlying allottee status or alter the character of the claim into something distinct; the distinction between allottees with a refund decree and other allottees is artificial. The Code&#039;s non obstante clause gives it overriding effect, so such applicants continue to fall within the class governed by the second proviso to Section 7(1), and non-compliance with that threshold justified rejection of the Section 7 application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 478 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751297</link>
      <description>An allottee in a real estate project remains a financial creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code because the amount raised from such allottee is deemed to have the commercial effect of a borrowing. A RERA refund order does not extinguish the underlying allottee status or alter the character of the claim into something distinct; the distinction between allottees with a refund decree and other allottees is artificial. The Code&#039;s non obstante clause gives it overriding effect, so such applicants continue to fall within the class governed by the second proviso to Section 7(1), and non-compliance with that threshold justified rejection of the Section 7 application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>