https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751295 Substantial custody already undergone in both the predicate offence and the PMLA proceedings was treated as a sufficient basis to grant bail during pendency of trial. The appellant had spent more than five years in custody for the predicate offence and over three years and nine months for the PMLA offence, and bail was therefore considered appropriate. The trial court was left to fix the bail terms, with directions for appearance on hearing dates, disclosure of a contact number, and liberty to seek cancellation if the appellant could not be contacted. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:17:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751295 Substantial custody already undergone in both the predicate offence and the PMLA proceedings was treated as a sufficient basis to grant bail during pendency of trial. The appellant had spent more than five years in custody for the predicate offence and over three years and nine months for the PMLA offence, and bail was therefore considered appropriate. The trial court was left to fix the bail terms, with directions for appearance on hearing dates, disclosure of a contact number, and liberty to seek cancellation if the appellant could not be contacted. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751295