https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313425 In matrimonial execution, the court treated the husband-wife relationship as fiduciary in the absence of any contrary plea, applying proviso (c) to Section 51 CPC. It further held that arrest and detention could be justified only for the portion of the decree representing sums the husband was bound, in a fiduciary capacity, to account for. On that basis, property and money entrusted by the wife at marriage, including cash, gold ornaments and other entrusted articles, fell within the proviso, while amounts later received during the marriage without proof of fiduciary accounting obligation did not. en-us Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:45:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313425 In matrimonial execution, the court treated the husband-wife relationship as fiduciary in the absence of any contrary plea, applying proviso (c) to Section 51 CPC. It further held that arrest and detention could be justified only for the portion of the decree representing sums the husband was bound, in a fiduciary capacity, to account for. On that basis, property and money entrusted by the wife at marriage, including cash, gold ornaments and other entrusted articles, fell within the proviso, while amounts later received during the marriage without proof of fiduciary accounting obligation did not. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313425