https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313414 Disciplinary punishment is subject only to limited judicial review on Wednesbury principles, so a court will not substitute its own view on the quantum of penalty merely because a lesser punishment is possible. Interference is justified only if the penalty is illegal, procedurally improper, irrational, or so disproportionate that it shocks the conscience of the court. Applying that standard, the removal of a bus conductor for fare and ticket irregularities was not shown to be shockingly disproportionate, and the High Court was correct in declining to interfere. en-us Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Mar 2026 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313414 Disciplinary punishment is subject only to limited judicial review on Wednesbury principles, so a court will not substitute its own view on the quantum of penalty merely because a lesser punishment is possible. Interference is justified only if the penalty is illegal, procedurally improper, irrational, or so disproportionate that it shocks the conscience of the court. Applying that standard, the removal of a bus conductor for fare and ticket irregularities was not shown to be shockingly disproportionate, and the High Court was correct in declining to interfere. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313414