<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Secured Creditor Status Upheld in Insolvency Case, Respondent&#039;s Charge Validated Under UP Industrial Area Development Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76539</link>
    <description>CIRP - GNIDA is Secured Creditor or not - The NCLAT affirmed the validity of the charge claimed by the respondent under Section 13-A of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. - The appellate tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s status as a secured creditor, citing recent Supreme Court precedent. It affirmed the validity of the charge under Section 13-A of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, and concluded that the respondent&#039;s classification as a secured creditor did not warrant interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:50:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Secured Creditor Status Upheld in Insolvency Case, Respondent&#039;s Charge Validated Under UP Industrial Area Development Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76539</link>
      <description>CIRP - GNIDA is Secured Creditor or not - The NCLAT affirmed the validity of the charge claimed by the respondent under Section 13-A of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. - The appellate tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s status as a secured creditor, citing recent Supreme Court precedent. It affirmed the validity of the charge under Section 13-A of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, and concluded that the respondent&#039;s classification as a secured creditor did not warrant interference.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:50:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>