<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 438 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751257</link>
    <description>Additional documents arising after commencement of pending Section 9 insolvency proceedings need not be taken on record unless they are shown to be just and necessary for deciding the application. Here, an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) and the High Court order on it were both subsequent to the insolvency filing, and the Supreme Court had already observed that its dismissal of the challenge to that arbitration order would not affect the IBC proceedings. In that context, the documents were treated as irrelevant to the Section 9 adjudication, and the rejection of the request to bring them on record was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 438 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751257</link>
      <description>Additional documents arising after commencement of pending Section 9 insolvency proceedings need not be taken on record unless they are shown to be just and necessary for deciding the application. Here, an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) and the High Court order on it were both subsequent to the insolvency filing, and the Supreme Court had already observed that its dismissal of the challenge to that arbitration order would not affect the IBC proceedings. In that context, the documents were treated as irrelevant to the Section 9 adjudication, and the rejection of the request to bring them on record was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>