<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Road Construction in Power Project Exempt from Service Tax Due to Distinctive Contractual Clauses and Subcontractor Use.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76534</link>
    <description>Benefit of service tax exemption - construction of a road as part of a broader works contract service for a thermal power project - The Tribunal concluded that the construction of the road was indeed identified as a separate activity within the contract, with its value determinable as per specific contractual clauses. The appellant’s engagement of a subcontractor for the road construction further substantiated the argument that it was a distinct activity. The Tribunal distinguished this case from scenarios where construction activities are so intertwined within a project that they cannot be segregated for tax purposes. - It ruled that the service tax demand on the value of road construction within the composite contract was unjustified. Demand of service tax set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:49:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Road Construction in Power Project Exempt from Service Tax Due to Distinctive Contractual Clauses and Subcontractor Use.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76534</link>
      <description>Benefit of service tax exemption - construction of a road as part of a broader works contract service for a thermal power project - The Tribunal concluded that the construction of the road was indeed identified as a separate activity within the contract, with its value determinable as per specific contractual clauses. The appellant’s engagement of a subcontractor for the road construction further substantiated the argument that it was a distinct activity. The Tribunal distinguished this case from scenarios where construction activities are so intertwined within a project that they cannot be segregated for tax purposes. - It ruled that the service tax demand on the value of road construction within the composite contract was unjustified. Demand of service tax set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:49:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>