<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 27 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36432</link>
    <description>The court quashed all reopening notices under Section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act in the 11 writ petitions. It held that Section 16A cannot be used for reopening completed assessments, and audit reports are insufficient grounds for reopening. The court stressed the duty of assessees to disclose primary facts and the WTO&#039;s obligation to investigate thoroughly. The respondents were barred from reopening completed assessments, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 27 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36432</link>
      <description>The court quashed all reopening notices under Section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act in the 11 writ petitions. It held that Section 16A cannot be used for reopening completed assessments, and audit reports are insufficient grounds for reopening. The court stressed the duty of assessees to disclose primary facts and the WTO&#039;s obligation to investigate thoroughly. The respondents were barred from reopening completed assessments, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>