<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1236 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313399</link>
    <description>ITAT Rajkot held that denial of deduction under section 80P for late filing of return cannot be made under prima facie adjustment provisions of section 143(1)(a)(v) for assessment year 2019-20, as the relevant amendment was effective from April 1, 2021. The tribunal found that section 143(1)(a)(ii) also does not permit such disallowance merely for delayed filing when return was filed within extended due date under section 139(4). The case was remanded to CIT(Appeals) for fresh adjudication on merits. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1236 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313399</link>
      <description>ITAT Rajkot held that denial of deduction under section 80P for late filing of return cannot be made under prima facie adjustment provisions of section 143(1)(a)(v) for assessment year 2019-20, as the relevant amendment was effective from April 1, 2021. The tribunal found that section 143(1)(a)(ii) also does not permit such disallowance merely for delayed filing when return was filed within extended due date under section 139(4). The case was remanded to CIT(Appeals) for fresh adjudication on merits. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>