<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 624 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313398</link>
    <description>Service conditions of Delhi Development Authority employees were treated as governed by statutory rules and regulations framed under the Delhi Development Act, 1957, and a statutory rule could not be supplemented by an executive order. Because the record did not establish with certainty that the purported recruitment regulations had been validly framed, and the validity challenge had not been properly examined earlier, the appellant was entitled to amend the writ petition to raise that issue. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on the validity and applicability of the purported rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:47:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 624 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313398</link>
      <description>Service conditions of Delhi Development Authority employees were treated as governed by statutory rules and regulations framed under the Delhi Development Act, 1957, and a statutory rule could not be supplemented by an executive order. Because the record did not establish with certainty that the purported recruitment regulations had been validly framed, and the validity challenge had not been properly examined earlier, the appellant was entitled to amend the writ petition to raise that issue. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on the validity and applicability of the purported rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>