<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 8 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36428</link>
    <description>A later partition arrangement was treated as genuine and valid, under which the deceased exchanged his earlier limited life interest in the Kakinada house and his share in another house for an absolute 1/5th share in the Kakinada property. On that footing, the arrangement was not regarded as a disposition or determination of his interest within section 11(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, and section 7 was also held inapplicable because he did not die with a life interest in the entire house. The estate duty consequence was that only the deceased&#039;s 1/5th share in the Kakinada house was includible in the principal value of the estate, not the full property value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 8 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36428</link>
      <description>A later partition arrangement was treated as genuine and valid, under which the deceased exchanged his earlier limited life interest in the Kakinada house and his share in another house for an absolute 1/5th share in the Kakinada property. On that footing, the arrangement was not regarded as a disposition or determination of his interest within section 11(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, and section 7 was also held inapplicable because he did not die with a life interest in the entire house. The estate duty consequence was that only the deceased&#039;s 1/5th share in the Kakinada house was includible in the principal value of the estate, not the full property value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>