<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Second Respondent in Summons Dispute, No Grounds for Interference Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76513</link>
    <description>Rejection of appellants’ challenge to Summons, summoning the appellants to appear before the Second respondent - The Court found that the second respondent had jurisdiction as per relevant rules and notifications, and the show cause notice directed the appellants to respond to the competent authority. - Although the summons was issued by the second respondent, the show cause notice directed the appellants to respond to the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax 1, Commissionerate, Bengaluru. - Therefore, the Court concluded that there was no reason to interfere with the learned Single Judge’s order regarding jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:56:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Second Respondent in Summons Dispute, No Grounds for Interference Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76513</link>
      <description>Rejection of appellants’ challenge to Summons, summoning the appellants to appear before the Second respondent - The Court found that the second respondent had jurisdiction as per relevant rules and notifications, and the show cause notice directed the appellants to respond to the competent authority. - Although the summons was issued by the second respondent, the show cause notice directed the appellants to respond to the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax 1, Commissionerate, Bengaluru. - Therefore, the Court concluded that there was no reason to interfere with the learned Single Judge’s order regarding jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:56:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>