<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1503 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313386</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision restricting disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D to Rs. 4,278, equivalent to exempt income earned. The tribunal held that expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income cannot exceed the actual exempt income amount. Following precedent from Mount Malt Bru Ltd., the ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that where expenditure exceeds exempt income, disallowance should be limited to the quantum of exempt dividend income received by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:38:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1503 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313386</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision restricting disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D to Rs. 4,278, equivalent to exempt income earned. The tribunal held that expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income cannot exceed the actual exempt income amount. Following precedent from Mount Malt Bru Ltd., the ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that where expenditure exceeds exempt income, disallowance should be limited to the quantum of exempt dividend income received by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>