<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 82 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36424</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment under section 147(a) was not justified. It emphasized the importance of specific references and establishing a clear connection between the assessee&#039;s credits and alleged non-genuine transactions to validate such reopening. The court awarded costs to the assessee, including counsel&#039;s fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 82 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36424</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment under section 147(a) was not justified. It emphasized the importance of specific references and establishing a clear connection between the assessee&#039;s credits and alleged non-genuine transactions to validate such reopening. The court awarded costs to the assessee, including counsel&#039;s fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>