<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 420 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751239</link>
    <description>HC allowed a writ petition challenging an ex-parte tax order under UP GST Act. The court found procedural deficiencies in the original notice, which did not provide proper opportunity for personal hearing. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the tax authority for fresh proceedings with a directive for the petitioner to submit a reply and appear before the Assessing Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 420 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751239</link>
      <description>HC allowed a writ petition challenging an ex-parte tax order under UP GST Act. The court found procedural deficiencies in the original notice, which did not provide proper opportunity for personal hearing. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the tax authority for fresh proceedings with a directive for the petitioner to submit a reply and appear before the Assessing Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>