<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 418 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751237</link>
    <description>An appellate order rejecting a first appeal for want of a certified copy of the original order was quashed because the defect was technical and should not defeat adjudication on merits. The writ court held that the appellant was entitled to have the dispute considered in accordance with law, with an opportunity of hearing. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the first appeal, decide it afresh on merits, and pass a reasoned order within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 418 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751237</link>
      <description>An appellate order rejecting a first appeal for want of a certified copy of the original order was quashed because the defect was technical and should not defeat adjudication on merits. The writ court held that the appellant was entitled to have the dispute considered in accordance with law, with an opportunity of hearing. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the first appeal, decide it afresh on merits, and pass a reasoned order within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>