<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 417 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751236</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax registration cancellation. The court found administrative orders lacked proper reasoning and violated constitutional principles of Article 14. Original cancellation order was set aside, with directions for petitioner to respond to show cause notice and enabling fresh adjudication by tax authority within prescribed timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 417 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751236</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax registration cancellation. The court found administrative orders lacked proper reasoning and violated constitutional principles of Article 14. Original cancellation order was set aside, with directions for petitioner to respond to show cause notice and enabling fresh adjudication by tax authority within prescribed timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>