<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 416 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751235</link>
    <description>HC ruled that retrospective GST registration cancellation was improper. The court modified the cancellation date to 31.12.2019, aligning with the business closure, and emphasized that such cancellations must be based on objective criteria. The decision highlighted the need for proper notice, opportunity to be heard, and transparent reasoning in administrative tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 416 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751235</link>
      <description>HC ruled that retrospective GST registration cancellation was improper. The court modified the cancellation date to 31.12.2019, aligning with the business closure, and emphasized that such cancellations must be based on objective criteria. The decision highlighted the need for proper notice, opportunity to be heard, and transparent reasoning in administrative tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>