<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 413 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751232</link>
    <description>HC ruled on a GST penalty challenge involving seized goods and a tax invoice. The court reduced the penalty, ordered goods and vehicle release upon payment, and directed the tax authority to establish an electronic appeal mechanism. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and citizens&#039; right to appeal, while recognizing the bona fide nature of the original transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 413 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751232</link>
      <description>HC ruled on a GST penalty challenge involving seized goods and a tax invoice. The court reduced the penalty, ordered goods and vehicle release upon payment, and directed the tax authority to establish an electronic appeal mechanism. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and citizens&#039; right to appeal, while recognizing the bona fide nature of the original transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>