https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751231 GST notices and an order were invalid because they were not authenticated by the competent authority in the manner prescribed by the governing rule. The court treated signature or digital signature as a mandatory requirement, and the admitted absence of any such authentication went to the validity of the communications. As a result, the impugned notices and order were set aside, with liberty to proceed in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751231 GST notices and an order were invalid because they were not authenticated by the competent authority in the manner prescribed by the governing rule. The court treated signature or digital signature as a mandatory requirement, and the admitted absence of any such authentication went to the validity of the communications. As a result, the impugned notices and order were set aside, with liberty to proceed in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751231