<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 401 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751220</link>
    <description>Writ interference against a show cause notice is ordinarily unavailable unless the notice is a nullity or patently without jurisdiction; jurisdictional objections should first be raised before the issuing authority, with statutory or constitutional remedies available after an adverse order. The court also treated valuation-based objections under the Service Tax valuation framework as matters for adjudication before the competent authority, which was required to consider the relevant legal position while deciding the reply. On that basis, interference with the summons and the Single Judge&#039;s order was declined, and the parties were left to pursue objections before adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:45:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 401 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751220</link>
      <description>Writ interference against a show cause notice is ordinarily unavailable unless the notice is a nullity or patently without jurisdiction; jurisdictional objections should first be raised before the issuing authority, with statutory or constitutional remedies available after an adverse order. The court also treated valuation-based objections under the Service Tax valuation framework as matters for adjudication before the competent authority, which was required to consider the relevant legal position while deciding the reply. On that basis, interference with the summons and the Single Judge&#039;s order was declined, and the parties were left to pursue objections before adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>