<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 398 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751217</link>
    <description>An air cargo agent building constructed as an annex to an air cargo terminal was treated as physically and functionally integral to the airport operation. Because it formed part of the cargo processing and clearance chain for export and import traffic, the building was held to appertain to the airport or aerodrome under the relevant definition. On that basis, the construction was excluded from works contract service, and the demand, penalty, and impugned order were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 398 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751217</link>
      <description>An air cargo agent building constructed as an annex to an air cargo terminal was treated as physically and functionally integral to the airport operation. Because it formed part of the cargo processing and clearance chain for export and import traffic, the building was held to appertain to the airport or aerodrome under the relevant definition. On that basis, the construction was excluded from works contract service, and the demand, penalty, and impugned order were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>