<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 397 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751216</link>
    <description>CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit eligibility on 16 specified services while availing Notification No. 1/2006-ST benefits. The tribunal followed precedent from coordinate bench decisions in hotel cases, holding that CENVAT credit on input services used for creating immovable property is eligible. The tribunal found no reason to take a different view from established precedents and agreed with appellant&#039;s submissions, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 397 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751216</link>
      <description>CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit eligibility on 16 specified services while availing Notification No. 1/2006-ST benefits. The tribunal followed precedent from coordinate bench decisions in hotel cases, holding that CENVAT credit on input services used for creating immovable property is eligible. The tribunal found no reason to take a different view from established precedents and agreed with appellant&#039;s submissions, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>