https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751187 A belated successive application under Section 311 CrPC to place additional documents on record was refused because the applicant had already withdrawn an earlier similar request, offered no explanation for the delay, and showed no changed circumstances or necessity for the just decision of the case. The application came after closure of complainant's evidence, examination of the accused under Section 313, and commencement of final arguments, so allowing it would have reopened the trial and undermined the expeditious disposal central to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The rejection was therefore upheld on the facts. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:42:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751187 A belated successive application under Section 311 CrPC to place additional documents on record was refused because the applicant had already withdrawn an earlier similar request, offered no explanation for the delay, and showed no changed circumstances or necessity for the just decision of the case. The application came after closure of complainant's evidence, examination of the accused under Section 313, and commencement of final arguments, so allowing it would have reopened the trial and undermined the expeditious disposal central to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The rejection was therefore upheld on the facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751187