https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313363 Acquisition of lands around the Tirumala temple complex for road widening, pilgrim amenities, choultries, kalyana mantapams and implementation of the development plan was treated as a valid public purpose, and the purpose description was held sufficiently specific despite the absence of a plot-wise construction plan. The Section 5-A enquiry was not invalidated because the objectors failed to show prejudice from the alleged non-supply of the development plan or from defects in considering objections. Article 26 was held not to bar compulsory acquisition of religious denomination property made in accordance with law, since acquisition with compensation does not by itself extinguish the denomination's constitutional rights. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Apr 2024 17:05:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313363 Acquisition of lands around the Tirumala temple complex for road widening, pilgrim amenities, choultries, kalyana mantapams and implementation of the development plan was treated as a valid public purpose, and the purpose description was held sufficiently specific despite the absence of a plot-wise construction plan. The Section 5-A enquiry was not invalidated because the objectors failed to show prejudice from the alleged non-supply of the development plan or from defects in considering objections. Article 26 was held not to bar compulsory acquisition of religious denomination property made in accordance with law, since acquisition with compensation does not by itself extinguish the denomination's constitutional rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313363