https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313362 The wide power to recall or re-examine a witness may be exercised to secure the ends of justice and enable the court to reach the truth. Such recall does not amount to filling a lacuna unless it causes serious prejudice to the accused and results in miscarriage of justice. On the facts, the defence had already placed the relevant visitor register extracts on record, and recall was sought only to clarify disputed entries. As no illegality, arbitrariness, perversity, or prejudice warranting interference was shown, the order allowing recall of the witnesses was upheld and interference was declined. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:22:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313362 The wide power to recall or re-examine a witness may be exercised to secure the ends of justice and enable the court to reach the truth. Such recall does not amount to filling a lacuna unless it causes serious prejudice to the accused and results in miscarriage of justice. On the facts, the defence had already placed the relevant visitor register extracts on record, and recall was sought only to clarify disputed entries. As no illegality, arbitrariness, perversity, or prejudice warranting interference was shown, the order allowing recall of the witnesses was upheld and interference was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313362