<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 384 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313357</link>
    <description>Section 311 CrPC confers a wide power to recall witnesses when further cross-examination is necessary for a just decision. Where the party had not earlier cross-examined the witnesses due to extraneous circumstances, the opportunity should not be denied merely because the matter may be addressed in final arguments. Delay by itself is not a sufficient ground to refuse recall if the testimony requires further testing for fairness and completeness. The trial court&#039;s reasons were found inadequate, and the refusal to recall the witnesses was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 15:42:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 384 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313357</link>
      <description>Section 311 CrPC confers a wide power to recall witnesses when further cross-examination is necessary for a just decision. Where the party had not earlier cross-examined the witnesses due to extraneous circumstances, the opportunity should not be denied merely because the matter may be addressed in final arguments. Delay by itself is not a sufficient ground to refuse recall if the testimony requires further testing for fairness and completeness. The trial court&#039;s reasons were found inadequate, and the refusal to recall the witnesses was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>