<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rejects Objection to Company Amalgamation Due to Lack of Creditor Standing; Appellant Not Listed in Financials.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76456</link>
    <description>Locus of appellant - The NCLT&#039;s decision dismissed the Appellant&#039;s objections to a scheme of amalgamation involving two companies - Appellant contended that they were a creditor based on previous agreements and royalty payments related to copyright material, thus entitled to object to the scheme and access scheme documents. - The Tribunal found no merit in the Appellant&#039;s arguments, affirming that the legal criteria for a creditor&#039;s locus standi in objecting to a scheme were not met by the Appellant. The NCLAT underscored that the Appellant&#039;s name was not listed in the audited financial statements nor among the unsecured creditors of either respondent company. This fact was pivotal in determining the Appellant&#039;s lack of standing to object to the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 13:06:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 13:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rejects Objection to Company Amalgamation Due to Lack of Creditor Standing; Appellant Not Listed in Financials.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76456</link>
      <description>Locus of appellant - The NCLT&#039;s decision dismissed the Appellant&#039;s objections to a scheme of amalgamation involving two companies - Appellant contended that they were a creditor based on previous agreements and royalty payments related to copyright material, thus entitled to object to the scheme and access scheme documents. - The Tribunal found no merit in the Appellant&#039;s arguments, affirming that the legal criteria for a creditor&#039;s locus standi in objecting to a scheme were not met by the Appellant. The NCLAT underscored that the Appellant&#039;s name was not listed in the audited financial statements nor among the unsecured creditors of either respondent company. This fact was pivotal in determining the Appellant&#039;s lack of standing to object to the scheme.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 13:06:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>