<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751182</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to a tax demand arising from audit observations for 2017-2018. The court set aside the original tax order, granting the petitioner three weeks to submit supporting documents and providing respondents the right to appropriate specified tax percentages. A fresh order was mandated within two months, with no costs awarded. The decision offered the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751182</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to a tax demand arising from audit observations for 2017-2018. The court set aside the original tax order, granting the petitioner three weeks to submit supporting documents and providing respondents the right to appropriate specified tax percentages. A fresh order was mandated within two months, with no costs awarded. The decision offered the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>