<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 361 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751180</link>
    <description>HC ruled on a GST dispute involving E-way bill discrepancies and tax assessment. The court directed the petitioner to pay 15% of disputed tax and allowed filing of an appeal within two weeks, despite initial delay. The Appellate Authority was instructed to accept the appeal if filed within the specified timeframe, effectively providing relief to the taxpayer while ensuring partial tax compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 361 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751180</link>
      <description>HC ruled on a GST dispute involving E-way bill discrepancies and tax assessment. The court directed the petitioner to pay 15% of disputed tax and allowed filing of an appeal within two weeks, despite initial delay. The Appellate Authority was instructed to accept the appeal if filed within the specified timeframe, effectively providing relief to the taxpayer while ensuring partial tax compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>